Radeon 760M vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy
VS
Radeon 520 Radeon 530 Radeon 540X Radeon 610 Radeon 610M Radeon 660M Radeon 680M Radeon 740M Radeon 760M Radeon 780M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.79
+126%

GTX TITAN X outperforms 760M by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking173371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.02no data
Power efficiency9.1367.30
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGM200Hawx Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072512
Core clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate209.183.17
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs19232
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN X 28.79
+126%
Radeon 760M 12.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12863
+126%
Radeon 760M 5691

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+117%
30
−117%
1440p40−45
+122%
18
−122%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.37no data
1440p24.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 39
+0%
39
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 29
+0%
29
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 17
+0%
17
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+0%
23
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 117% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 122% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.79 12.74
Recency 17 March 2015 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 126% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GTX 750 v2 GeForce GTX 750 v2
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
GTX 750 v2 GeForce GTX 750 v2
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
GT 740 OEM GeForce GT 740 OEM
vs
GT 530 OEM GT 530 OEM
GT 730 OEM GeForce GT 730 OEM
vs
RX 5700M RX 5700M
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
FX 1800M FX 1800M
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
ATI X800 XT X800 XT
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
SIS Mirage 2 M760 2 M760
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
R7 360E R7 360E
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI 3D Rage II+ DVD Rage II+ DVD
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
ATI Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 242 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 254 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.