GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
33.53
+16%

GTX TITAN X outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.17100.00
Power efficiency9.1924.77
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1124% better value for money than GTX TITAN X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721536
Core clock speed1000 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1152.6
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs19296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+13.6%
88
−13.6%
1440p65−70
+12.1%
58
−12.1%
4K35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.992.60
1440p15.373.95
4K28.547.16

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+0%
80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+0%
66
+0%
Battlefield 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+0%
304
+0%
Hitman 3 77
+0%
77
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 209
+0%
209
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 155
+0%
155
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 225
+0%
225
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+0%
125
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+0%
49
+0%
Battlefield 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+0%
256
+0%
Hitman 3 74
+0%
74
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 207
+0%
207
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+0%
118
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+0%
214
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+0%
53
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hitman 3 63
+0%
63
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+0%
80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+0%
46
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+0%
36
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+0%
32
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+0%
182
+0%
Hitman 3 41
+0%
41
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
+0%
203
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hitman 3 25
+0%
25
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+0%
19
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+0%
13
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 14% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 12% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 9% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.53 28.90
Recency 17 March 2015 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 16% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RX 580G Radeon RX 580G
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RX 590 GME Radeon RX 590 GME
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1650 TU106 GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
MX450 30.5W 8Gbps GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 221 vote

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1571 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.