GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs GTX TITAN BLACK

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN BLACK
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
23.28
+25.8%

GTX TITAN BLACK outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN BLACK
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking243302
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.88no data
Power efficiency6.4125.48
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110BTU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28801024
Core clock speed889 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate235.299.84
Floating-point processing power5.645 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN BLACK 23.28
+25.8%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN BLACK 8951
+25.8%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX TITAN BLACK 11690
+25.5%
GTX 1650 Mobile 9313

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+18.6%
59
−18.6%
1440p45−50
+25%
36
−25%
4K27−30
+17.4%
23
−17.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.27no data
1440p22.20no data
4K37.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Elden Ring 47
+0%
47
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 83
+0%
83
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Elden Ring 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 165
+0%
165
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 47
+0%
47
+0%
World of Tanks 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Elden Ring 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 47
+0%
47
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN BLACK and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN BLACK is 19% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN BLACK is 25% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN BLACK is 17% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 23.28 18.51
Recency 18 February 2014 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

GTX TITAN BLACK has a 25.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
vs
GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
vs
R9 390 Radeon R9 390
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
Radeon 550X Radeon 550X
GTX TITAN Z 2050 Mobile
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile TITAN Z
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
vs
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
GT 120M GeForce GT 120M
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
ATI 8500 Radeon 8500
GTX 645 OEM GeForce GTX 645 OEM
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
GTX TITAN 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile TITAN
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 6450 OEM Radeon HD 6450 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3369 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.