UHD Graphics 630 vs GeForce GTX 980M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M with UHD Graphics 630, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
19.06
+517%

GTX 980M outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286755
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Power efficiency13.7514.86
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Comet Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536184
Core clock speed1038 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)unknown15 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8426.45
Floating-point processing power1.659 TFLOPS0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs9623

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Quick Syncno data+
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.103
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M 19.06
+517%
UHD Graphics 630 3.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980M 7355
+517%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980M 31944
+315%
UHD Graphics 630 7704

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980M 12517
+599%
UHD Graphics 630 1790

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980M 9682
+700%
UHD Graphics 630 1211

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980M 65241
+566%
UHD Graphics 630 9798

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980M 327632
+208%
UHD Graphics 630 106362

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 980M 2805
+577%
UHD Graphics 630 415

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 980M 111
+485%
UHD Graphics 630 19

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 980M 84
+451%
UHD Graphics 630 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 980M 42
+44.4%
UHD Graphics 630 29

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 980M 5
+42.4%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 980M 39
+141%
UHD Graphics 630 16

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 980M 27
+93.6%
UHD Graphics 630 14

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 980M 23
+645%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 980M 47
+472%
UHD Graphics 630 8

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 980M 6
+1900%
UHD Graphics 630 0

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 980M 47
+472%
UHD Graphics 630 8

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 980M 84
+451%
UHD Graphics 630 15

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 980M 39
+141%
UHD Graphics 630 16

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 980M 42
+44.4%
UHD Graphics 630 29

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 980M 5
+42.4%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 980M 27
+93.6%
UHD Graphics 630 14

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 980M 23
+645%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 980M 6
+1900%
UHD Graphics 630 0.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
+541%
27−30
−541%
Full HD69
+360%
15
−360%
1440p31
+210%
10
−210%
4K27
+286%
7
−286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+500%
5
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+629%
7
−629%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Battlefield 5 67
+570%
10
−570%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Far Cry 5 62
+786%
7
−786%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+556%
9
−556%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+553%
30
−553%
Hitman 3 35−40
+517%
6
−517%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+300%
21−24
−300%
Metro Exodus 65
+400%
13
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+467%
9
−467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+525%
16
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+197%
30
−197%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+656%
9−10
−656%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Battlefield 5 57
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Far Cry 5 52
+767%
6−7
−767%
Far Cry New Dawn 47
+488%
8−9
−488%
Forza Horizon 4 191
+607%
27
−607%
Hitman 3 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+300%
21−24
−300%
Metro Exodus 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+538%
8−9
−538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+425%
12
−425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
+707%
15
−707%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+218%
28
−218%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Far Cry 5 38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+176%
16−18
−176%
Hitman 3 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+300%
21−24
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+473%
11
−473%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+128%
35−40
−128%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+538%
8−9
−538%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
+540%
5−6
−540%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+538%
21−24
−538%
Hitman 3 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Metro Exodus 38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+495%
18−20
−495%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Hitman 3 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+600%
14−16
−600%
Metro Exodus 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+633%
3−4
−633%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

This is how GTX 980M and UHD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 541% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 360% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 210% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 286% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 980M is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 980M surpassed UHD Graphics 630 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.06 3.09
Recency 7 October 2014 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 980M has a 516.8% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 333 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3788 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.