ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs GeForce GTX 980

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2091548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.53no data
Power efficiency11.98no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGM204RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1064 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate155.60.8
Floating-point processing power4.981 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s166 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 11113
+555550%
ATI 9200 SE 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94no data
1440p51no data
4K39no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.84no data
1440p10.76no data
4K14.08no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80 no data
Battlefield 5 109 no data
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 80 no data
Fortnite 242 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90 no data
Forza Horizon 5 85−90 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93 no data
Valorant 170−180 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80 no data
Battlefield 5 90 no data
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 73 no data
Fortnite 116 no data
Forza Horizon 4 83 no data
Forza Horizon 5 85−90 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 72 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 no data
Valorant 170−180 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 69 no data
Forza Horizon 4 59 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 no data
Valorant 170−180 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 91 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 210−220 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 62 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 48 no data
Forza Horizon 4 48 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 53 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 59 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 32 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 34 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 September 2014 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 980 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 489.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1545 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.