GeForce GTX 460 vs GTX 980

Place in the ranking	193	593
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.94	1.25
Power efficiency	12.16	2.55
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GM204	GF104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 September 2014 (10 years ago)	12 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 has 775% better value for money than GTX 460.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	336
Core clock speed	1064 MHz	675 MHz
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,200 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	155.6	37.80
Floating-point processing power	4.981 TFLOPS	0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	24
TMUs	128	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	210 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
SLI options	+	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	86.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Multi monitor support	4 displays	+
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.78
+391%

GTX 460 5.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 11104
+391%

GTX 460 2261

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 12938
+403%

GTX 460 2570

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 980 34824
+348%

GTX 460 7776

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 980 96
+256%

GTX 460 27

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

GTX 980 1889
+212%

GTX 460 605

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	91 +406%	18−20 −406%
1440p	50 +400%	10−12 −400%
4K	39 +457%	7−8 −457%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.03	11.06
1440p	10.98	19.90
4K	14.08	28.43

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

+433%

9−10
−433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	69 +393%	14−16 −393%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +444%	9−10 −444%
Battlefield 5	86 +438%	16−18 −438%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +433%	9−10 −433%
Far Cry 5	84 +425%	16−18 −425%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 +450%	14−16 −450%
Forza Horizon 4	253 +406%	50−55 −406%
Hitman 3	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +438%	24−27 −438%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +444%	18−20 −444%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130 +442%	24−27 −442%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +429%	21−24 −429%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	83 +419%	16−18 −419%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +444%	9−10 −444%
Battlefield 5	74 +429%	14−16 −429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +433%	9−10 −433%
Far Cry 5	69 +393%	14−16 −393%
Far Cry New Dawn	64 +433%	12−14 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	230 +411%	45−50 −411%
Hitman 3	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +438%	24−27 −438%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +444%	18−20 −444%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132 +450%	24−27 −450%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +429%	21−24 −429%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 +400%	7−8 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +444%	9−10 −444%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +433%	9−10 −433%
Far Cry 5	50 +400%	10−11 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +392%	12−14 −392%
Hitman 3	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +438%	24−27 −438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +411%	9−10 −411%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +429%	21−24 −429%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
+421%

14−16

−421%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47 +422%	9−10 −422%
Far Cry New Dawn	44 +450%	8−9 −450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +440%	5−6 −440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +450%	6−7 −450%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Far Cry 5	33 +450%	6−7 −450%
Forza Horizon 4	147 +444%	27−30 −444%
Hitman 3	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +450%	10−11 −450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +429%	7−8 −429%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +423%	30−33 −423%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

+444%

9−10
−444%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +450%	4−5 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +500%	4−5 −500%
Hitman 3	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +437%	27−30 −437%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +467%	6−7 −467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 +480%	5−6 −480%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 +600%	2−3 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Far Cry 5	16 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +467%	6−7 −467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +429%	7−8 −429%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+400%

5−6
−400%

This is how GTX 980 and GTX 460 compete in popular games:

GTX 980 is 406% faster in 1080p
GTX 980 is 400% faster in 1440p
GTX 980 is 457% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.78	5.86
Recency	19 September 2014	12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	160 Watt

GTX 980 has a 391.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460, on the other hand, has 3.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.