Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 970M

Place in the ranking	354	312
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.76	24.19
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM204	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 October 2014 (10 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,560.89	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	896
Core clock speed	924 MHz	765 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	83.04	75.60
Floating-point processing power	2.657 TFLOPS	2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	80	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	120 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970M 14.83

T1000 Max-Q 17.35
+17%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970M 5722

T1000 Max-Q 6695
+17%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	136 −10.3%	150−160 +10.3%
Full HD	55 −9.1%	60−65 +9.1%
1440p	26 −15.4%	30−35 +15.4%
4K	21 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	46.56	no data
1440p	98.50	no data
4K	121.95	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−17.4%

27−30
+17.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	42 +7.7%	35−40 −7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −20.8%	27−30 +20.8%
Battlefield 5	52 −9.6%	55−60 +9.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Far Cry 5	50 +22%	40−45 −22%
Far Cry New Dawn	48 +2.1%	45−50 −2.1%
Forza Horizon 4	144 +30.9%	110−120 −30.9%
Hitman 3	27−30 −17.9%	30−35 +17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −13.2%	85−90 +13.2%
Metro Exodus	53 −13.2%	60−65 +13.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −14.6%	45−50 +14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	81 +42.1%	55−60 −42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −9%	85−90 +9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −20.8%	27−30 +20.8%
Battlefield 5	44 −29.5%	55−60 +29.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Far Cry 5	41 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	37 −27%	45−50 +27%
Forza Horizon 4	131 +19.1%	110−120 −19.1%
Hitman 3	27−30 −17.9%	30−35 +17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −13.2%	85−90 +13.2%
Metro Exodus	44 −36.4%	60−65 +36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −14.6%	45−50 +14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −18.8%	55−60 +18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	101 +153%	40−45 −153%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −9%	85−90 +9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21 −85.7%	35−40 +85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −20.8%	27−30 +20.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Far Cry 5	29 −41.4%	40−45 +41.4%
Forza Horizon 4	36 −206%	110−120 +206%
Hitman 3	27−30 −17.9%	30−35 +17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −13.2%	85−90 +13.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −18.8%	55−60 +18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −9%	85−90 +9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−14.6%

45−50
+14.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	26 −30.8%	30−35 +30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 −8%	27−30 +8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Far Cry 5	19 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80 −17.5%	90−95 +17.5%
Hitman 3	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	25 −28%	30−35 +28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −25.9%	30−35 +25.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −15.4%	100−110 +15.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−20.8%

27−30
+20.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −20.3%	85−90 +20.3%
Metro Exodus	14 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	8 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −300%	24−27 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−15.4%

14−16
+15.4%

This is how GTX 970M and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is 10% faster in 900p
T1000 Max-Q is 9% faster in 1080p
T1000 Max-Q is 15% faster in 1440p
T1000 Max-Q is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 970M is 153% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 970M is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.83	17.35
Recency	7 October 2014	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm

T1000 Max-Q has a 17% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 970M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.