Matrox Parhelia 256 MB vs GeForce GTX 970M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking354not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.77no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGM204Parhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)25 June 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate83.040.8
Floating-point processing power2.657 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.5
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2014 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 970M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 970M and Matrox Parhelia 256 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook card while Matrox Parhelia 256 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
Matrox Parhelia 256 MB
Parhelia 256 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 308 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 10 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 256 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.