RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 970

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970 with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 148 Watt
24.26

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms GTX 970 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking224142
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.4293.21
Power efficiency11.6735.11
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM204GA106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX A2000 12 GB has 595% better value for money than GTX 970.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16643328
Core clock speed1050 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)148 Watt70 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate122.5124.8
Floating-point processing power3.92 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs5648
TMUs104104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm167 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.24x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 970 24.26
RTX A2000 12 GB 34.52
+42.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970 9634
RTX A2000 12 GB 13707
+42.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%
1440p52
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
4K40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.11
−0.8%
4.08
+0.8%
1440p6.33
+1.4%
6.41
−1.4%
4K8.23
−0.8%
8.16
+0.8%
  • GTX 970 and RTX A2000 12 GB have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 970 and RTX A2000 12 GB have nearly equal cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 970 and RTX A2000 12 GB have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−29.9%
100−105
+29.9%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−36.4%
150−160
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%
Valorant 100−105
−40%
140−150
+40%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−29.9%
100−105
+29.9%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Dota 2 47
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Fortnite 120−130
−36%
170−180
+36%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−36.4%
150−160
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Metro Exodus 16
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 63
−34.9%
85−90
+34.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
−35.7%
95−100
+35.7%
Valorant 100−105
−40%
140−150
+40%
World of Tanks 250−260
−35.7%
350−400
+35.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
−41.7%
85−90
+41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Dota 2 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−36.4%
150−160
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 47
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Valorant 100−105
−40%
140−150
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Dota 2 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−37.1%
240−250
+37.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
World of Tanks 160−170
−38.6%
230−240
+38.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Valorant 65−70
−39.7%
95−100
+39.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Dota 2 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Metro Exodus 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Dota 2 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Fortnite 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Valorant 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

This is how GTX 970 and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 38% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 35% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.26 34.52
Recency 19 September 2014 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 148 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has a 42.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 111.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 970 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4964 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 146 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.