Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs GeForce GTX 965M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.23no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM206SVega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2016 (10 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096
Core clock speed944 MHz1406 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1677 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown225 Watt
Texture fill rate73.60429.3
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs64256
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 64 Liquid has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.