Radeon R9 M380 vs GeForce GTX 965M

Place in the ranking	455	543
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.72	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	GM206S	Strato
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2016 (8 years ago)	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	768
Core clock speed	944 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	no data
Texture fill rate	73.60	48.00
Floating-point processing power	2.355 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Eyefinity	-	+
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
HD3D	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
DualGraphics	-	+
TrueAudio	-	+
ZeroCore	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.7	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.3	-
Mantle	-	+
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.84
+36.9%

R9 M380 7.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3796
+36.9%

R9 M380 2773

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	44 +46.7%	30−35 −46.7%
1440p	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
4K	21 +50%	14−16 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+36.4%

10−12

−36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	49 +133%	21−24 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	40 +100%	20−22 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +38.3%	45−50 −38.3%
Hitman 3	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +28.6%	40−45 −28.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +55%	20−22 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 +125%	20−22 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	69 +188%	24−27 −188%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +16.7%	50−55 −16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	37 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 +45%	20−22 −45%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +38.3%	45−50 −38.3%
Hitman 3	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +28.6%	40−45 −28.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +55%	20−22 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +65%	20−22 −65%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	86 +291%	21−24 −291%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +16.7%	50−55 −16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	13 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	28 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Hitman 3	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	23 −82.6%	40−45 +82.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +16.7%	50−55 −16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

32
+60%

20−22

−60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +65.4%	24−27 −65.4%
Hitman 3	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18 +20%	14−16 −20%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +34.8%	45−50 −34.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21
+75%

12−14

−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Hitman 3	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +82.6%	21−24 −82.6%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +225%	4−5 −225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +75%	8−9 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10
+42.9%

7−8

−42.9%

This is how GTX 965M and R9 M380 compete in popular games:

GTX 965M is 47% faster in 1080p
GTX 965M is 43% faster in 1440p
GTX 965M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 965M is 291% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M380 is 83% faster.

All in all, in popular games: