Radeon RX 5500 vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI with Radeon RX 5500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
14.93

RX 5500 outperforms GTX 965M SLI by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking334264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.16
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (10 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481408
Core clock speed924 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 MHz1845 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data162.4
Floating-point processing powerno data5.196 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data180 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
−25%
90−95
+25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Fortnite 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−26.9%
85−90
+26.9%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
Valorant 120−130
−24%
160−170
+24%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−29.2%
270−280
+29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Fortnite 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−26.9%
85−90
+26.9%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Valorant 120−130
−24%
160−170
+24%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−26.9%
85−90
+26.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Valorant 120−130
−24%
160−170
+24%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−26.1%
150−160
+26.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−27.4%
200−210
+27.4%
Valorant 160−170
−29.6%
210−220
+29.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Valorant 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Dota 2 55−60
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and RX 5500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500 is 25% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.93 19.63
Recency 5 January 2015 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 5500 has a 31.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 236 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M SLI or Radeon RX 5500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.