Radeon R9 M390 vs GeForce GTX 960

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960 with Radeon R9 M390, including specs and performance data.

GTX 960
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
15.75
+56.7%

GTX 960 outperforms R9 M390 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking338444
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.85no data
Power efficiency9.09no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameGM206Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 January 2015 (9 years ago)9 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1127 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate75.39no data
Floating-point processing power2.413 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)400 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan+-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960 15.75
+56.7%
R9 M390 10.05

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 960 10768
+57.9%
R9 M390 6819

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+53.8%
39
−53.8%
4K31
+47.6%
21
−47.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.32no data
4K6.42no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+53%
65−70
−53%
Hitman 3 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+46.3%
50−55
−46.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+74.2%
30−35
−74.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+59.4%
30−35
−59.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+27%
60−65
−27%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+53%
65−70
−53%
Hitman 3 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+46.3%
50−55
−46.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+74.2%
30−35
−74.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+59.4%
30−35
−59.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 131
+385%
27−30
−385%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+27%
60−65
−27%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+53%
65−70
−53%
Hitman 3 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+46.3%
50−55
−46.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+59.4%
30−35
−59.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+55.6%
18
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+27%
60−65
−27%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+88.6%
40−45
−88.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+52.4%
60−65
−52.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+88.1%
40−45
−88.1%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+25%
12
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

This is how GTX 960 and R9 M390 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 960 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 960 is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 960 is 385% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 960 surpassed R9 M390 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.75 10.05
Recency 22 January 2015 9 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

GTX 960 has a 56.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R9 M390, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The GeForce GTX 960 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960 is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3752 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.