ATI Radeon 9800 vs GeForce GTX 950M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 950M with Radeon 9800, including specs and performance data.
GTX 950M outperforms ATI 9800 by a whopping 4521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 573 | 1431 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.16 | 0.27 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | Rage 8 (2002−2007) |
| GPU code name | GM107 | R350 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 March 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,870 million | 117 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 2.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.439 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 8 |
| TMUs | 40 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x Molex |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 290 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 18.56 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| VGA аnalog display support | + | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GameStream | + | - |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | - |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
| GameWorks | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
| BatteryBoost | + | - |
| Ansel | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0 (9_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 29 | 0−1 |
| 1440p | 20 | -0−1 |
| 4K | 16 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 22 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 48
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| Valorant | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 38 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 10 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55
+5400%
|
1−2
−5400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 100−110
+5100%
|
2−3
−5100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 15 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 67
+6600%
|
1−2
−6600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 26 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 17 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 21−24 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 19 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.47 | 0.14 |
| Recency | 13 March 2015 | 1 March 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 37 Watt |
GTX 950M has a 4521.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.
ATI 9800, on the other hand, has 102.7% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 950M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook card while Radeon 9800 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
