Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950 with Tesla C2050, including specs and performance data.

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 90 Watt
13.83
+68%

GTX 950 outperforms Tesla C2050 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking371503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.50no data
Power efficiency10.982.47
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM206GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 August 2015 (9 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768448
Core clock speed1024 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate57.0232.14
Floating-point processing power1.825 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length202 mm248 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s750 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.83
+68%
Tesla C2050 8.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5335
+68%
Tesla C2050 3175

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 950 41
+5.1%
Tesla C2050 39

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
4K22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
+80%
60−65
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+75%
12−14
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+75%
40−45
−75%
Hitman 3 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Hitman 3 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

This is how GTX 950 and Tesla C2050 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950 is 78% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950 is 83% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.83 8.23
Recency 20 August 2015 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 238 Watt

GTX 950 has a 68% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 164.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2050, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla C2050 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while Tesla C2050 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2080 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.