Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce GTX 950

Place in the ranking	375	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.75	62.60
Power efficiency	10.55	17.40
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GM206	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 August 2015 (9 years ago)	10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6650 XT has 615% better value for money than GTX 950.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2048
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	2055 MHz
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz	2635 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	176 Watt
Texture fill rate	57.02	337.3
Floating-point processing power	1.825 TFLOPS	10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	48	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	202 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s	2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth	105.6 GB/s	280.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.85

RX 6650 XT 44.67
+223%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5337

RX 6650 XT 17213
+223%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 950 8351

RX 6650 XT 41739
+400%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 950 6208

RX 6650 XT 29796
+380%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 950 37454

RX 6650 XT 167944
+348%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 −176%	138 +176%
1440p	18−20 −256%	64 +256%
4K	21 −66.7%	35 +66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.18	2.89
1440p	8.83	6.23
4K	7.57	11.40

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−510%

128
+510%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −194%	90−95 +194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −250%	75−80 +250%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −218%	140−150 +218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −218%	85−90 +218%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −414%	108 +414%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −194%	90−95 +194%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −187%	100−110 +187%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −126%	200−210 +126%
Hitman 3	24−27 −269%	95−100 +269%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −155%	180−190 +155%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −198%	130−140 +198%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −273%	160−170 +273%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −81.3%	130−140 +81.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −194%	90−95 +194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −250%	75−80 +250%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −218%	140−150 +218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −218%	85−90 +218%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −319%	88 +319%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −194%	90−95 +194%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −187%	100−110 +187%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −126%	200−210 +126%
Hitman 3	24−27 −269%	95−100 +269%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −155%	180−190 +155%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −198%	130−140 +198%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −393%	222 +393%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	108 +17.4%	90−95 −17.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −81.3%	130−140 +81.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −194%	90−95 +194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −250%	75−80 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −218%	85−90 +218%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −271%	78 +271%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −194%	90−95 +194%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −126%	200−210 +126%
Hitman 3	24−27 −269%	95−100 +269%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −144%	173 +144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −329%	193 +329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 −410%	107 +410%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +15.4%	65 −15.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−163%

100−105
+163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −226%	85−90 +226%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −229%	65−70 +229%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −250%	45−50 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −364%	50−55 +364%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −253%	50−55 +253%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −529%	44 +529%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −246%	240−250 +246%
Hitman 3	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −361%	129 +361%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −375%	114 +375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −417%	124 +417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −386%	65−70 +386%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −140%	200−210 +140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−235%

75−80
+235%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −254%	45−50 +254%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −290%	35−40 +290%
Hitman 3	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −354%	55−60 +354%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −331%	56 +331%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −300%	30−35 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18 +800%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −250%	60−65 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −392%	64 +392%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −360%	23 +360%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−215%

40−45
+215%

This is how GTX 950 and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6650 XT is 176% faster in 1080p
RX 6650 XT is 256% faster in 1440p
RX 6650 XT is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 950 is 17% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 950 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RX 6650 XT is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.85	44.67
Recency	20 August 2015	10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	176 Watt

GTX 950 has 95.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 222.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.