GeForce GTX 460M vs GTX 950

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950 with GeForce GTX 460M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 90 Watt
13.85
+340%

GTX 950 outperforms GTX 460M by a whopping 340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking375752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.75no data
Power efficiency10.554.32
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM206GF106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 August 2015 (9 years ago)3 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed1024 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate57.0221.60
Floating-point processing power1.825 TFLOPS0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s60.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API with Feature Level 12.1
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.85
+340%
GTX 460M 3.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5337
+340%
GTX 460M 1213

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 950 8351
+415%
GTX 460M 1623

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 950 6208
+353%
GTX 460M 1370

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 950 16715
+306%
GTX 460M 4119

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 950 41
+193%
GTX 460M 14

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p130−140
+333%
30
−333%
Full HD50
+31.6%
38
−31.6%
4K21
+425%
4−5
−425%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.18no data
4K7.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Hitman 3 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+196%
24−27
−196%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Hitman 3 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+196%
24−27
−196%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
+620%
14−16
−620%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Hitman 3 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+196%
24−27
−196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+40%
14−16
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Hitman 3 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+330%
20−22
−330%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+550%
2−3
−550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

This is how GTX 950 and GTX 460M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950 is 333% faster in 900p
  • GTX 950 is 32% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950 is 425% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 950 is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 950 surpassed GTX 460M in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.85 3.15
Recency 20 August 2015 3 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 950 has a 339.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460M, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 460M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 460M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2121 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.