Radeon R9 M275X vs GeForce GTX 780M

Place in the ranking	457	687
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.60	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	GK104	Venus
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 May 2013 (11 years ago)	28 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	640
Compute units	no data	10
Core clock speed	823 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	925 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	102.0	37.00
Floating-point processing power	2.448 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	128	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	-	+
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
HD3D	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
DualGraphics	-	+
ZeroCore	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	DirectX® 11
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
Mantle	-	+
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.91
+136%

R9 M275X 4.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780M 3811
+136%

R9 M275X 1615

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

65
+141%

27−30

−141%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Elden Ring	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Valorant	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Dota 2	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Elden Ring	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +156%	16−18 −156%
Fortnite	55−60 +142%	24−27 −142%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 +143%	14−16 −143%
Valorant	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%
World of Tanks	191 +139%	80−85 −139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Dota 2	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +156%	16−18 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
Valorant	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Elden Ring	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +161%	18−20 −161%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
World of Tanks	70−75 +137%	30−33 −137%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Valorant	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Dota 2	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Elden Ring	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Dota 2	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Fortnite	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Valorant	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%