Radeon Pro 555 vs GeForce GTX 780M

Place in the ranking	453	511
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.63	7.57
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK104	Polaris 21
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 May 2013 (11 years ago)	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	768
Core clock speed	823 MHz	850 MHz
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,540 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.0	40.80
Floating-point processing power	2.448 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	128	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1275 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	81.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.86
+21.1%

Pro 555 8.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780M 3804
+21.1%

Pro 555 3140

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 780M 7777
+50%

Pro 555 5185

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780M 5244
+40.9%

Pro 555 3721

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 780M 35965
+59%

Pro 555 22624

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 780M 12815
+14.3%

Pro 555 11207

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

GTX 780M 12696
+8%

Pro 555 11757

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 780M 76
+81.3%

Pro 555 42

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65 +103%	32 −103%
4K	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+15.4%

12−14

−15.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +20%	20 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −3.2%	32 +3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −13%	26 +13%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +22.2%	50−55 −22.2%
Hitman 3	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +17%	45−50 −17%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −27.3%	42 +27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +10.5%	55−60 −10.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −8.3%	26 +8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +19.2%	26 −19.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +9.5%	21 −9.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +22.2%	50−55 −22.2%
Hitman 3	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +17%	45−50 −17%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +10.5%	55−60 −10.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +53.3%	15 −53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +267%	18 −267%
Hitman 3	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +17%	45−50 −17%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +21.4%	14 −21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +10.5%	55−60 −10.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+21.7%

21−24

−21.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +37.5%	30−35 −37.5%
Hitman 3	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +21.2%	50−55 −21.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+21.4%

14−16

−21.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+12.5%

8−9

−12.5%

This is how GTX 780M and Pro 555 compete in popular games:

GTX 780M is 103% faster in 1080p
GTX 780M is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 780M is 267% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 555 is 27% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 780M is ahead in 66 tests (92%)
Pro 555 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.86	8.14
Recency	11 May 2013	5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	75 Watt