GeForce RTX 3090 vs GTX 780M SLI

Place in the ranking	284	24
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	14.90
Power efficiency	6.81	13.80
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N14E-GTX	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	10496
Core clock speed	823 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	7080 Million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	350 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	556.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	35.58 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	112
TMUs	no data	328
Tensor Cores	no data	328
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	336 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2x 4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1219 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	936.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	+	8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M SLI 19.53

RTX 3090 69.29
+255%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 780M SLI 14140

RTX 3090 61518
+335%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 780M SLI 36004

RTX 3090 124350
+245%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780M SLI 10091

RTX 3090 47241
+368%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 780M SLI 66148

RTX 3090 231612
+250%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 −105%	203 +105%
1440p	35−40 −274%	131 +274%
4K	24−27 −275%	90 +275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	7.38
1440p	no data	11.44
4K	no data	16.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−547%

207
+547%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −253%	159 +253%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −235%	114 +235%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −236%	220−230 +236%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −190%	110−120 +190%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −450%	176 +450%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −149%	110−120 +149%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −213%	160−170 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −90.4%	230−240 +90.4%
Hitman 3	40−45 −193%	117 +193%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −161%	250−260 +161%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −106%	144 +106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −141%	130 +141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −336%	290−300 +336%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −117%	200 +117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −449%	247 +449%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −209%	105 +209%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −236%	220−230 +236%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −190%	110−120 +190%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −372%	151 +372%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −149%	110−120 +149%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −213%	160−170 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −90.4%	230−240 +90.4%
Hitman 3	40−45 −193%	117 +193%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −161%	250−260 +161%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −106%	144 +106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −126%	120−130 +126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −500%	402 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −231%	140−150 +231%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −116%	199 +116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −140%	108 +140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −168%	91 +168%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −190%	110−120 +190%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −319%	134 +319%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −149%	110−120 +149%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −73.6%	217 +73.6%
Hitman 3	40−45 −190%	116 +190%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −204%	295 +204%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −424%	351 +424%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −302%	181 +302%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −16.3%	107 +16.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−139%

129
+139%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −323%	160−170 +323%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −343%	93 +343%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −339%	79 +339%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −268%	80−85 +268%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −675%	93 +675%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −252%	80−85 +252%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −140%	270−280 +140%
Hitman 3	24−27 −379%	115 +379%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −468%	233 +468%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −266%	139 +266%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −549%	266 +549%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −561%	152 +561%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −70.6%	203 +70.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−285%

127
+285%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −335%	85−90 +335%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −360%	65−70 +360%
Hitman 3	14−16 −453%	83 +453%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −117%	220−230 +117%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −541%	141 +541%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −629%	153 +629%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −483%	70 +483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −470%	57 +470%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −364%	50−55 +364%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1050%	46 +1050%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −446%	153 +446%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −591%	159 +591%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −567%	60 +567%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−517%

111
+517%

This is how GTX 780M SLI and RTX 3090 compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 is 105% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 is 274% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 is 275% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3090 surpassed GTX 780M SLI in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.53	69.29
Recency	30 May 2013	1 September 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	350 Watt

GTX 780M SLI has 75% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090, on the other hand, has a 254.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.