Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce GTX 780

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon HD 4890, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
20.74
+432%

GTX 780 outperforms ATI HD 4890 by a whopping 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking250667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.720.39
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK110RV790
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)2 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780 has 1110% better value for money than ATI HD 4890.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304800
Core clock speed863 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million959 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate173.234.00
Floating-point performance4,156 gflops1,360.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz3900 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s124.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 20.74
+432%
ATI HD 4890 3.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 8006
+431%
ATI HD 4890 1507

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
+440%
10−12
−440%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.74 3.90
Recency 23 May 2013 2 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 190 Watt

GTX 780 has a 431.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4890, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4890 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
ATI Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4890

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1011 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4890 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.