Radeon 680M vs GeForce GTX 775M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M and Radeon 680M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.42

680M outperforms GTX 775M by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469336
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.5722.28
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2Rembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344768
Core clock speed719 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.379 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3600 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.42
Radeon 680M 15.98
+69.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
Radeon 680M 6166
+69.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
Radeon 680M 10371
+70.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−76.2%
37
+76.2%
1440p10−12
−70%
17
+70%
4K6−7
−83.3%
11
+83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−160%
39
+160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−171%
38
+171%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−96.6%
55−60
+96.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−86.4%
40−45
+86.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−80.8%
45−50
+80.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−74.6%
110−120
+74.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−77.8%
32
+77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−65.4%
85−90
+65.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−80.8%
45−50
+80.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−83.9%
55−60
+83.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−121%
31
+121%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−96.6%
55−60
+96.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−40%
21
+40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−86.4%
40−45
+86.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−80.8%
45−50
+80.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−74.6%
110−120
+74.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−66.7%
30
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−65.4%
85−90
+65.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−80.8%
45−50
+80.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−51.6%
47
+51.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−92.9%
27
+92.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−13.3%
17
+13.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−86.4%
40−45
+86.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−74.6%
110−120
+74.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−50%
27
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+20.9%
43
−20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−29%
40
+29%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+8.3%
24
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+239%
18
−239%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−80.8%
45−50
+80.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−83.3%
30−35
+83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−129%
90−95
+129%
Hitman 3 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−146%
30−35
+146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−145%
27
+145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−75%
100−110
+75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−128%
85−90
+128%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−133%
14
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%

This is how GTX 775M and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 680M is 76% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 680M is 70% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 680M is 83% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 775M is 239% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 680M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • Radeon 680M is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.42 15.98
Recency 24 September 2013 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has a 69.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 936 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.