RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Place in the ranking	735	29
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.31	33.62
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GK104	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	8 November 2013 (11 years ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	6144
Core clock speed	797 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2175 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	89.26	417.6
Floating-point processing power	2.142 TFLOPS	26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	112	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	245 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.0	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.37	63.78
Recency	8 November 2013	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt

GTX 775M Mac Edition has 30% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1792.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.