Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 770M

Place in the ranking	550	650
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.50	3.74
Power efficiency	6.64	9.46
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK106	Lexa
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.99	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 770M has 20% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	960	512
Core clock speed	811 MHz	925 MHz
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	1219 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	63.76	39.01
Floating-point processing power	1.53 TFLOPS	1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	16
TMUs	80	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	48 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 6.95
+50.4%

PRO WX 2100 4.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2785
+50.5%

PRO WX 2100 1850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

49
+63.3%

30−35

−63.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.88
+28.1%

4.97

−28.1%

GTX 770M has 28% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Valorant	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Dota 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Fortnite	40−45 +53.6%	27−30 −53.6%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +43.9%	40−45 −43.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Valorant	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%
World of Tanks	151 +91.1%	75−80 −91.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Dota 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +43.9%	40−45 −43.9%
Valorant	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +25.8%	30−35 −25.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
World of Tanks	50−55 +52.9%	30−35 −52.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Valorant	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Fortnite	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Valorant	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

This is how GTX 770M and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

GTX 770M is 63% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M is 267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M is ahead in 59 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.95	4.62
Recency	30 May 2013	4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt