RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
13.33

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 770M SLI by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data84.16
Power efficiency6.1244.60
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202816
Core clock speed811 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Elden Ring 40−45
−225%
130−140
+225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Valorant 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Dota 2 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
Elden Ring 40−45
−225%
130−140
+225%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%
Fortnite 75−80
−229%
250−260
+229%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−206%
300−310
+206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−225%
130−140
+225%
Valorant 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%
World of Tanks 170−180
−235%
600−650
+235%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Dota 2 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−206%
300−310
+206%
Valorant 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Elden Ring 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−200%
300−310
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
World of Tanks 90−95
−219%
300−310
+219%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Valorant 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Dota 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Elden Ring 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Fortnite 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Valorant 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.33 45.35
Recency 30 May 2013 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 240.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.