UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce GTX 765M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 765M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.18
+9.7%

GTX 765M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.78no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK106Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed850 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed863 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.23no data
Floating-point processing power1.326 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.18
+9.7%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 765M 4019
+26.9%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 765M 14870
+9%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 765M 2479
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
+0.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 765M 17616
+12.1%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Full HD39
+129%
17
−129%
1440p27−30
+8%
25
−8%
4K12−14
+0%
12
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−120%
11
+120%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−83.3%
22
+83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
47
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−33.3%
16
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+9.3%
43
−9.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+230%
10
−230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how GTX 765M and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is 13% faster in 900p
  • GTX 765M is 129% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 765M is 8% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 765M is 230% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 120% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is ahead in 48 tests (71%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.18 4.72
Recency 30 May 2013 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

GTX 765M has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 765M and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.