Tesla P4 vs GeForce GTX 765M

Place in the ranking	617	239
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.82	21.52
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK106	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2560
Core clock speed	850 MHz	886 MHz
Boost clock speed	863 MHz	1114 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.23	178.2
Floating-point processing power	1.326 TFLOPS	5.704 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	64	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.18

Tesla P4 23.14
+347%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 765M 1997

Tesla P4 8925
+347%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	51 −331%	220−230 +331%
Full HD	39 −336%	170−180 +336%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
−344%

40−45

+344%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Hitman 3	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −326%	200−210 +326%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Hitman 3	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −326%	200−210 +326%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Hitman 3	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −326%	200−210 +326%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−329%

60−65
+329%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Hitman 3	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−344%

40−45

+344%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Hitman 3	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−300%

24−27

+300%

This is how GTX 765M and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:

Tesla P4 is 331% faster in 900p
Tesla P4 is 336% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.18	23.14
Recency	30 May 2013	13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm

Tesla P4 has a 346.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.