GeForce RTX 2070 vs GTX 765M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M with GeForce RTX 2070, including specs and performance data.

GTX 765M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.18

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 765M by a whopping 709% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61995
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.20
Power efficiency4.7316.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK106TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)17 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682304
Core clock speed850 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed863 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate55.23233.3
Floating-point processing power1.326 TFLOPS7.465 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
G-SYNC support-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.18
RTX 2070 41.89
+709%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 765M 1997
RTX 2070 16141
+708%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 765M 4019
RTX 2070 31260
+678%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 765M 14870
RTX 2070 63155
+325%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 765M 2479
RTX 2070 23186
+835%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 765M 17616
RTX 2070 127652
+625%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 765M 7240
RTX 2070 87885
+1114%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 765M 6714
RTX 2070 83224
+1140%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 765M 5514
RTX 2070 95666
+1635%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p51
−684%
400−450
+684%
Full HD39
−228%
128
+228%
1440p10−12
−800%
90
+800%
4K7−8
−743%
59
+743%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.90
1440pno data5.54
4Kno data8.46

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−621%
101
+621%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1640%
87
+1640%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1162%
164
+1162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−955%
116
+955%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1027%
124
+1027%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−957%
148
+957%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−645%
246
+645%
Hitman 3 10−12
−955%
116
+955%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−682%
258
+682%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1100%
144
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−686%
110
+686%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1050%
207
+1050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−440%
254
+440%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−864%
135
+864%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1100%
156
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−864%
106
+864%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−818%
101
+818%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−671%
108
+671%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−588%
227
+588%
Hitman 3 10−12
−927%
113
+927%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−652%
248
+652%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1100%
144
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−671%
108
+671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−761%
150−160
+761%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−378%
85−90
+378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−419%
244
+419%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−357%
64
+357%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1200%
65
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−609%
78
+609%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−618%
79
+618%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−233%
110
+233%
Hitman 3 10−12
−755%
94
+755%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−321%
139
+321%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−761%
150−160
+761%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−383%
87
+383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−36.2%
64
+36.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−607%
99
+607%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−960%
106
+960%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−838%
75
+838%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−940%
52
+940%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 50
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−900%
60
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1692%
215
+1692%
Hitman 3 9−10
−611%
64
+611%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−767%
104
+767%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2633%
82
+2633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−627%
240
+627%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−833%
84
+833%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1225%
53
+1225%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1367%
44
+1367%
Hitman 3 1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1350%
116
+1350%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6200%
63
+6200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1100%
36
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Far Cry 5 3−4
−933%
31
+933%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1475%
63
+1475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−683%
47
+683%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how GTX 765M and RTX 2070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 is 684% faster in 900p
  • RTX 2070 is 228% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 is 800% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 is 743% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 is 6200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.18 41.89
Recency 30 May 2013 17 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 175 Watt

GTX 765M has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070, on the other hand, has a 708.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3593 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.