GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs GTX 760 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GeForce GTX 660 OEM ... Rev. 2 ... Ti GeForce GTX 670 GeForce GTX 680 ... Mac Edition GeForce GTX 690 GeForce GTX 760 ... OEM ... Ti OEM ... X2 GeForce GTX 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q ... Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM with GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
14.06

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 760 Ti OEM by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.9731.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13444608
Core clock speed915 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate109.8244.1
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs112144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 Ti OEM 14.06
RTX 4070 Mobile 50.61
+260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760 Ti OEM 5427
RTX 4070 Mobile 19530
+260%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−271%
130
+271%
1440p21−24
−267%
77
+267%
4K12−14
−300%
48
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 133
+0%
133
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 233
+0%
233
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 101
+0%
101
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 183
+0%
183
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 204
+0%
204
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+0%
116
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 89
+0%
89
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+0%
75
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 143
+0%
143
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
+0%
134
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+0%
88
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+0%
70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+0%
73
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how GTX 760 Ti OEM and RTX 4070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 271% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 267% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.06 50.61
Recency 27 September 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 260% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 47.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
RX 6300 Radeon RX 6300
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
Graphics 320SP Mobile Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
ATI X1800 XL Radeon X1800 XL
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GA103 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
6200 LE AGP 512 MB GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GTX 760 OEM GeForce GTX 760 OEM
vs
Ice Lake GT3e Ice Lake GT3e
GTX 760 OEM GeForce GTX 760 OEM
vs
RX 540X Radeon RX 540X
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
vs
FirePro S9100 FirePro S9100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 73 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1580 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.