ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK104R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 August 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed823 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate85.251
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs966

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2013 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 465.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.