Radeon RX 5600M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 750 Ti with Radeon RX 5600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.12

RX 5600M outperforms GTX 750 Ti by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447247
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.98no data
Power efficiency11.5610.43
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)7 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Core clock speed1020 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1265 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40182.2
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS5.829 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.12
RX 5600M 22.82
+125%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 Ti 3899
RX 5600M 8795
+126%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 750 Ti 5378
RX 5600M 24213
+350%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 750 Ti 21608
+16.3%
RX 5600M 18582

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 750 Ti 4294
RX 5600M 17653
+311%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 750 Ti 31349
RX 5600M 72335
+131%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−68.6%
86
+68.6%
1440p24−27
−138%
57
+138%
4K10−12
−160%
26
+160%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.92no data
1440p6.21no data
4K14.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−179%
67
+179%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−367%
70
+367%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−280%
76
+280%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−126%
50−55
+126%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−103%
130−140
+103%
Hitman 3 18−20
−253%
67
+253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−92.7%
100−110
+92.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−328%
137
+328%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−171%
76
+171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−251%
221
+251%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−287%
58
+287%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−240%
68
+240%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−126%
50−55
+126%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−103%
130−140
+103%
Hitman 3 18−20
−237%
64
+237%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−92.7%
100−110
+92.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−234%
107
+234%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−150%
70
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−244%
217
+244%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−104%
49
+104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−200%
45
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−150%
50
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−126%
50−55
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−103%
130−140
+103%
Hitman 3 18−20
−205%
58
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−83.6%
101
+83.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−137%
64
+137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+96.9%
32
−96.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−139%
67
+139%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−115%
40−45
+115%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−300%
24
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−184%
120−130
+184%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
38
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−248%
73
+248%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−269%
45−50
+269%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−208%
197
+208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−124%
35−40
+124%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Hitman 3 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−166%
110−120
+166%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−138%
30−35
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−225%
13
+225%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600M is 69% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600M is 138% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600M is 160% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 97% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5600M is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 5600M is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.12 22.82
Recency 18 February 2014 7 July 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 750 Ti has 150% lower power consumption.

RX 5600M, on the other hand, has a 125.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5600M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 6567 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 232 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.