Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GTX 670MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.06

RTX 6000 outperforms GTX 670MX by a whopping 859% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.24
Power efficiency4.6712.93
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK104TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9604608
Core clock speed600 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate48.08509.8
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs80288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX 5.06
RTX 6000 48.54
+859%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670MX 1951
RTX 6000 18733
+860%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 670MX 6047
RTX 6000 147152
+2333%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 670MX 5316
RTX 6000 126987
+2289%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
−797%
350−400
+797%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data18.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Hitman 3 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−844%
170−180
+844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Hitman 3 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−844%
170−180
+844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−844%
170−180
+844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−829%
130−140
+829%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Hitman 3 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−844%
170−180
+844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−844%
170−180
+844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Hitman 3 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hitman 3 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%

This is how GTX 670MX and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 797% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.06 48.54
Recency 1 October 2012 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 670MX has 246.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 859.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 51 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 129 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.