GeForce GTX 1660 vs GTX 670M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670M with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670M
2012
1536 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.56

GTX 1660 outperforms GTX 670M by a whopping 564% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657186
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.17
Power efficiency4.1717.30
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF114TU116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3361408
Core clock speed598 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate33.49157.1
Floating-point processing power0.8037 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs5688

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width192bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.0 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670M 4.56
GTX 1660 30.28
+564%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670M 1756
GTX 1660 11669
+565%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670M 2698
GTX 1660 21064
+681%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 670M 12670
GTX 1660 71229
+462%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670M 1950
GTX 1660 14164
+626%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 670M 14940
GTX 1660 81755
+447%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 670M 6448
GTX 1660 57961
+799%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
−541%
250−260
+541%
Full HD40
−108%
83
+108%
1440p7−8
−600%
49
+600%
4K3−4
−767%
26
+767%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.64
1440pno data4.47
4Kno data8.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−788%
71
+788%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−630%
73
+630%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−625%
58
+625%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−492%
75−80
+492%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−489%
160−170
+489%
Hitman 3 10−11
−590%
69
+590%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−920%
306
+920%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1340%
144
+1340%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−833%
112
+833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−518%
100−110
+518%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−404%
227
+404%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−925%
123
+925%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−950%
42
+950%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−570%
67
+570%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−492%
75−80
+492%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−489%
160−170
+489%
Hitman 3 10−11
−570%
67
+570%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−857%
287
+857%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1030%
113
+1030%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−558%
79
+558%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−547%
110
+547%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−276%
60−65
+276%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−376%
214
+376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−390%
49
+390%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40
+400%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−250%
98
+250%
Hitman 3 10−11
−490%
59
+490%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−210%
93
+210%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−459%
95
+459%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−235%
57
+235%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+55.2%
29
−55.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−575%
81
+575%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−557%
45−50
+557%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−750%
34
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%
Hitman 3 9−10
−333%
39
+333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−570%
67
+570%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−568%
187
+568%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−563%
53
+563%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2000%
63
+2000%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 35

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−750%
17
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10
Far Cry 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1567%
50
+1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−420%
26
+420%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
+0%
27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+0%
67
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+0%
36
+0%

This is how GTX 670M and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 541% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1660 is 108% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 600% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 767% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 670M is 55% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 670M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 1660 is ahead in 66 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 30.28
Recency 22 March 2012 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 670M has 60% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has a 564% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 92 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5335 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.