RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.47

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 660 Ti by a whopping 465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking41129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.09no data
Power efficiency5.3234.67
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2012 (12 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13446144
Core clock speed915 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate109.8417.6
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs2480
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm245 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5160 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.47
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.82
+465%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 Ti 4425
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 25014
+465%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15296
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 147450
+864%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15397
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 119948
+679%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD73
−448%
400−450
+448%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−463%
180−190
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−426%
400−450
+426%
Hitman 3 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−441%
200−210
+441%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−463%
180−190
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−441%
200−210
+441%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−463%
180−190
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−426%
400−450
+426%
Hitman 3 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−441%
200−210
+441%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−463%
180−190
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−441%
200−210
+441%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−426%
400−450
+426%
Hitman 3 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−441%
200−210
+441%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−463%
180−190
+463%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−456%
300−310
+456%
Hitman 3 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−456%
400−450
+456%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Hitman 3 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−447%
290−300
+447%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 448% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.47 64.82
Recency 16 August 2012 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 465.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 804 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 36 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.