GeForce 920M vs GTX 660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti with GeForce 920M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.47
+517%

GTX 660 Ti outperforms 920M by a whopping 517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking418915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.19no data
Power efficiency5.243.86
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK104GK208B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 August 2012 (12 years ago)13 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344384
Core clock speed915 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate109.830.53
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs11232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR564 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s900 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.47
+517%
GeForce 920M 1.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 Ti 4420
+516%
GeForce 920M 718

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 660 Ti 8415
+390%
GeForce 920M 1719

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 660 Ti 23726
+325%
GeForce 920M 5587

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 660 Ti 5432
+368%
GeForce 920M 1162

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 660 Ti 37758
+421%
GeForce 920M 7242

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15315
+313%
GeForce 920M 3709

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15397
+379%
GeForce 920M 3215

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 660 Ti 11274
+308%
GeForce 920M 2766

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 660 Ti 43
+291%
GeForce 920M 11

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75
+400%
15
−400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+986%
7−8
−986%
Hitman 3 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+259%
16−18
−259%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+80%
15
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+986%
7−8
−986%
Hitman 3 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+259%
16−18
−259%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+70.6%
17
−70.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+986%
7−8
−986%
Hitman 3 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+259%
16−18
−259%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+625%
4
−625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Hitman 3 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+563%
8−9
−563%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and GeForce 920M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 660 Ti is 3500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 660 Ti surpassed GeForce 920M in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.47 1.86
Recency 16 August 2012 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 33 Watt

GTX 660 Ti has a 516.7% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 920M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 354.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce 920M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 816 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1320 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.