GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs GTX 650 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 645 OEM GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
6.58

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms GTX 650 Ti by a whopping 501% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti
RTX 2080 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking575112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency4.1218.14
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK106TU104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed928 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.39299.5
Floating-point processing power1.425 TFLOPS9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti 6.58
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 39.52
+501%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 650 Ti 3430
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 24960
+628%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−548%
136
+548%
1440p14−16
−571%
94
+571%
4K10−12
−570%
67
+570%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.10no data
1440p10.64no data
4K14.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 265
+0%
265
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 116
+0%
116
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Valorant 216
+0%
216
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 217
+0%
217
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 127
+0%
127
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 162
+0%
162
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+0%
97
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 89
+0%
89
+0%

This is how GTX 650 Ti and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 548% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 571% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 570% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.58 39.52
Recency 9 October 2012 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 650 Ti has 36.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 500.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 6850 X2 Radeon HD 6850 X2
RTX 2080 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
GTX TITAN TITAN
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 780 Rev. 2
GTX TITAN TITAN
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
MX150 GP107 GeForce MX150 GP107
GTX TITAN TITAN
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
HD 7720 OEM Radeon HD 7720 OEM
GTX 660 660
vs
GTX 480 512 480 Core 512
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
vs
R9 260 OEM Radeon R9 260 OEM
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
vs
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 1876 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 133 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.