Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 580

Place in the ranking	408	466
Place by popularity	not in top-100	86
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.08	no data
Power efficiency	3.36	23.18
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GF110	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	9 November 2010 (14 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	96
Core clock speed	772 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	49.41	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.581 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	no data
Memory bus width	384 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz (4008 data rate)	no data
Memory bandwidth	192.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.2	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	+	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.98
+26.5%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 580 6065

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504
+7.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 580 21941

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978
+18.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 580 4970

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
Full HD	97 +273%	26 −273%
1200p	78 +30%	60−65 −30%
1440p	18−20 +20%	15 −20%
4K	12−14 +9.1%	11 −9.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.14	no data
1440p	27.72	no data
4K	41.58	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−11.1%

20
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +27.3%	22 −27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −16.7%	21 +16.7%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +31%	27−30 −31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −50%	36 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +12.5%	16 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +27.3%	21−24 −27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +26.9%	24−27 −26.9%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 −9.1%	24 +9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −96.8%	124 +96.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +11.4%	35 −11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +94.1%	17 −94.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +22.6%	30−35 −22.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −30.4%	90 +30.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +31%	27−30 −31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −33.3%	32 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +27.3%	21−24 −27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +26.9%	24−27 −26.9%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 −4.5%	23 +4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −77.8%	112 +77.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +39.3%	28 −39.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +26.9%	26 −26.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +26.7%	30 −26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −21.7%	84 +21.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +100%	14 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4.3%	23 −4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +63.6%	11 −63.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +27.3%	21−24 −27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 +10%	20 −10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +174%	23 −174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +58.3%	24 −58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +114%	14 −114%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +13.1%	60−65 −13.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+136%

−136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −16.7%	7 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +39%	40−45 −39%
Hitman 3	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −5.6%	19 +5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +23.3%	60−65 −23.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+18.8%

16−18

−18.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Hitman 3	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +41%	35−40 −41%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −20%	12 +20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −10%	11 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+22.2%

9−10

−22.2%

This is how GTX 580 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

GTX 580 is 35% faster in 900p
GTX 580 is 273% faster in 1080p
GTX 580 is 30% faster in 1200p
GTX 580 is 20% faster in 1440p
GTX 580 is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 580 is 174% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 97% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 580 is ahead in 57 tests (79%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.98	9.47
Recency	9 November 2010	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	28 Watt

GTX 580 has a 26.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 771.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.