GeForce FX 5200 vs GTX 580

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce FX 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 580
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 244 Watt
10.35
+51650%

GTX 580 outperforms FX 5200 by a whopping 51650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4231511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.82no data
Power efficiency3.37no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF110NV18 C1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 November 2010 (14 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $69.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed772 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)244 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate49.411.000
Floating-point processing power1.581 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz (4008 data rate)200 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 580 10.35
+51650%
FX 5200 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 580 4625
+65971%
FX 5200 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53-0−1
Full HD99-0−1
1200p78-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Fortnite 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Dota 2 75−80 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Fortnite 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Dota 2 75−80 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 60−65 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 0.02
Recency 9 November 2010 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTX 580 has a 51650% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
GeForce FX 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 477 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 259 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 580 or GeForce FX 5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.