Radeon 680M vs GeForce GTX 570

Place in the ranking	444	336
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.15	no data
Power efficiency	3.24	22.29
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF110	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2010 (13 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	768
Core clock speed	732 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	43.92	105.6
Floating-point processing power	1.405 TFLOPS	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	32
TMUs	60	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	320 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1900 MHz (3800 data rate)	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	152.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 570 10.18

Radeon 680M 15.98
+57%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 570 3928

Radeon 680M 6166
+57%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 570 5033

Radeon 680M 10371
+106%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 570 17632

Radeon 680M 34600
+96.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 570 4390

Radeon 680M 6865
+56.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80 +116%	37 −116%
1440p	10−12 −70%	17 +70%
4K	7−8 −57.1%	11 +57.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.36	no data
1440p	34.90	no data
4K	49.86	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−144%

39
+144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −153%	38 +153%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −78.1%	55−60 +78.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −81.3%	29 +81.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −61.8%	110−120 +61.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −68.4%	32 +68.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −53.6%	85−90 +53.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −72.7%	55−60 +72.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −107%	31 +107%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −78.1%	55−60 +78.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −31.3%	21 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −61.8%	110−120 +61.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −57.9%	30 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −53.6%	85−90 +53.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −42.4%	47 +42.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −80%	27 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −61.8%	110−120 +61.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −42.1%	27 +42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +30.2%	43 −30.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −21.2%	40 +21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +12.5%	24 −12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +256%	18 −256%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−67.9%

45−50
+67.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −65%	30−35 +65%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	11 +120%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −104%	90−95 +104%
Hitman 3	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −113%	30−35 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −108%	27 +108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −70%	17 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −64.1%	100−110 +64.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−70.6%

27−30
+70.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4 +300%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −100%	14 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−50%

14−16
+50%

This is how GTX 570 and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

GTX 570 is 116% faster in 1080p
Radeon 680M is 70% faster in 1440p
Radeon 680M is 57% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 570 is 256% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 680M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 570 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
Radeon 680M is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.18	15.98
Recency	7 December 2010	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt

Radeon 680M has a 57% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 338% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 is a desktop card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.