ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs GeForce GTX 570

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking444not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.07no data
Power efficiency3.24no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF110Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed732 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate43.920.08
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPSno data
ROPs401
TMUs601

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB8 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1900 MHz (3800 data rate)75 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s600 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI1x DB13W3
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.1
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2010 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 8 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 350 nm

GTX 570 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 570 and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 570
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 469 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.