Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560M 560M SLI 570M 580M 580M SLI 765M 850M 860M 950M 960M 970M 980M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI and Radeon RX 6300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 560M SLI
2011
100 Watt
6.05

6300M outperforms 560M SLI by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
RX 6300M RX 6300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking641381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.6633.77
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameN12E-GSNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed775 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data115.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.686 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−193%
85−90
+193%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
−230%
30−35
+230%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−158%
65−70
+158%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−193%
85−90
+193%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−168%
50−55
+168%
Fortnite 35−40
−135%
85−90
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
Valorant 70−75
−81.4%
120−130
+81.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−158%
65−70
+158%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−193%
85−90
+193%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−103%
200−210
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
Dota 2 50−55
−94%
95−100
+94%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−168%
50−55
+168%
Fortnite 35−40
−135%
85−90
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−181%
55−60
+181%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−163%
40−45
+163%
Valorant 70−75
−81.4%
120−130
+81.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−158%
65−70
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
Dota 2 50−55
−94%
95−100
+94%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−168%
50−55
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−152%
55−60
+152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−163%
40−45
+163%
Valorant 70−75
−81.4%
120−130
+81.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−135%
85−90
+135%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−145%
110−120
+145%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−290%
150−160
+290%
Valorant 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−171%
35−40
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Valorant 30−35
−181%
85−90
+181%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−155%
55−60
+155%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6300M is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6300M performs better in 58 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.05 15.35
Recency 6 January 2011 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

RX 6300M has a 154% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 567% more advanced lithography process, and 186% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560M SLI GeForce GTX 560M SLI
vs
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
GTX 560M SLI GeForce GTX 560M SLI
vs
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6850M XT RX 6850M XT
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6800S RX 6800S
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6650M RX 6650M
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6600S RX 6600S
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6500 RX 6500
GTX 560M SLI 560M SLI
vs
GTX 1630 1630
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6550S RX 6550S
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
vs
RX 6450M RX 6450M
ATI HD 5850 HD 5850
vs
9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTS SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560M SLI or Radeon RX 6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.