Quadro FX 4000 SDI vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.82no data
Power efficiency3.24no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF114NV41
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years ago)19 April 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed823 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million190 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate52.675.100
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs6412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm214 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 4x SDI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2011 19 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 560 Ti has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

FX 4000 SDI, on the other hand, has 13.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Quadro FX 4000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4000 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
Quadro FX 4000 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 813 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.