Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

Place in the ranking	630	86
Place by popularity	not in top-100	72
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.13	47.59
Power efficiency	2.29	13.19
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GF114	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 February 2012 (12 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89.99	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 36508% better value for money than GTX 560 SE.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	288	2560
Core clock speed	736 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	35.33	304.8
Floating-point processing power	0.8479 TFLOPS	9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	64
TMUs	48	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	210 mm	272 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	957 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	91.87 GB/s	448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 SE 4.96

RX 5700 XT 42.93
+766%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 SE 1914

RX 5700 XT 16563
+765%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 560 SE 2400

RX 5700 XT 26189
+991%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −800%	126 +800%
1440p	8−9 −825%	74 +825%
4K	5−6 −820%	46 +820%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.43	3.17
1440p	11.25	5.39
4K	18.00	8.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	76 +0%	76 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110 +0%	110 +0%
Battlefield 5	199 +0%	199 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +0%	118 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +0%	78 +0%
Far Cry 5	125 +0%	125 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	118 +0%	118 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	298 +0%	298 +0%
Hitman 3	84 +0%	84 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	313 +0%	313 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 +0%	115 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	259 +0%	259 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	154 +0%	154 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 +0%	91 +0%
Battlefield 5	165 +0%	165 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	107 +0%	107 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +0%	75 +0%
Far Cry 5	101 +0%	101 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	108 +0%	108 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	283 +0%	283 +0%
Hitman 3	86 +0%	86 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	294 +0%	294 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	97 +0%	97 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	193 +0%	193 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	248 +0%	248 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +0%	62 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +0%	78 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80 +0%	80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 +0%	67 +0%
Far Cry 5	73 +0%	73 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	148 +0%	148 +0%
Hitman 3	83 +0%	83 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	135 +0%	135 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	171 +0%	171 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	93 +0%	93 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	67 +0%	67 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

+0%

108

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	126 +0%	126 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +0%	84 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +0%	53 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +0%	59 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	58 +0%	58 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	273 +0%	273 +0%
Hitman 3	59 +0%	59 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	104 +0%	104 +0%
Metro Exodus	104 +0%	104 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	119 +0%	119 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	241 +0%	241 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	56 +0%	56 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	44 +0%	44 +0%
Hitman 3	45 +0%	45 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	121 +0%	121 +0%
Metro Exodus	65 +0%	65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +0%	54 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 +0%	35 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 +0%	33 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +0%	33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +0%	17 +0%
Far Cry 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +0%	79 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	71 +0%	71 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	13 +0%	13 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

This is how GTX 560 SE and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 800% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 825% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 820% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.96	42.93
Recency	20 February 2012	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt

GTX 560 SE has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 765.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 SE in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.