Radeon RX 6600S vs GeForce GTX 485M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon RX 6600S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 485M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
6.11

RX 6600S outperforms GTX 485M by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking578169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.2628.11
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF104Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed1150 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate36.80224.0
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M 6.11
RX 6600S 32.26
+428%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 485M 2359
RX 6600S 12444
+428%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
−421%
250−260
+421%
Full HD66
−355%
300−350
+355%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−375%
75−80
+375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−576%
110−120
+576%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−454%
70−75
+454%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−500%
75−80
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−424%
85−90
+424%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−353%
180−190
+353%
Hitman 3 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−308%
150−160
+308%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−625%
110−120
+625%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−505%
120−130
+505%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−146%
120−130
+146%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−375%
75−80
+375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−576%
110−120
+576%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−454%
70−75
+454%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−500%
75−80
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−424%
85−90
+424%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−353%
180−190
+353%
Hitman 3 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−308%
150−160
+308%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−625%
110−120
+625%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−505%
120−130
+505%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−146%
120−130
+146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−375%
75−80
+375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−454%
70−75
+454%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−500%
75−80
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−353%
180−190
+353%
Hitman 3 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−308%
150−160
+308%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−505%
120−130
+505%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−146%
120−130
+146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−500%
50−55
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−533%
35−40
+533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1022%
200−210
+1022%
Hitman 3 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−485%
75−80
+485%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−880%
45−50
+880%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−455%
60−65
+455%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1033%
170−180
+1033%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10−12
Far Cry 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 45−50
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−417%
30−35
+417%

This is how GTX 485M and RX 6600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is 421% faster in 900p
  • RX 6600S is 355% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600S surpassed GTX 485M in all 70 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.11 32.26
Recency 5 January 2011 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

RX 6600S has a 428% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.