Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 480
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 480 with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire, including specs and performance data.
GTX 480 outperforms HD 6990M Crossfire by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 431 | 452 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.67 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.95 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | GF100 | Blackcomb XTX |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 12 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 2240 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 2x1700 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 42.06 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.345 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | no data |
| TMUs | 60 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2x2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | no data |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 100−110
+1%
| 99
−1%
|
| Full HD | 110−120
+3.8%
| 106
−3.8%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 4.54 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Elden Ring | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45
−7.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+7.7%
|
35−40
−7.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+8.3%
|
35−40
−8.3%
|
| Elden Ring | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
| Fortnite | 60−65
+5.1%
|
55−60
−5.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45
−7.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+5.6%
|
35−40
−5.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+5.1%
|
75−80
−5.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+7.7%
|
35−40
−7.7%
|
| World of Tanks | 150−160
+4.8%
|
140−150
−4.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+8.3%
|
35−40
−8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45
−7.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+5.1%
|
75−80
−5.1%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+7.7%
|
35−40
−7.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Elden Ring | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+4.2%
|
45−50
−4.2%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| World of Tanks | 75−80
+5.6%
|
70−75
−5.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+10.5%
|
18−20
−10.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+4.3%
|
21−24
−4.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+10.5%
|
18−20
−10.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+4%
|
24−27
−4%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Elden Ring | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.9%
|
27−30
−6.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Fortnite | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
This is how GTX 480 and HD 6990M Crossfire compete in popular games:
- GTX 480 is 1% faster in 900p
- GTX 480 is 4% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 480 is 25% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 480 is ahead in 58 tests (92%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.71 | 10.08 |
| Recency | 26 March 2010 | 12 July 2011 |
GTX 480 has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score.
HD 6990M Crossfire, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
