ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs GeForce GTX 470M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking629not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.63no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF104RV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288no data
Core clock speed535 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate25.681.100
Floating-point processing power0.6163 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs484

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 470M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 167.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 470M and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470M is a notebook card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
GeForce GTX 470M
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.