Tesla K80m vs GeForce GTX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.28no data
Power efficiency2.61no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGF100GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 March 2010 (14 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482x 2496
Core clock speed607 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data824 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.052x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power1.089 TFLOPSno data
ROPs402x 48
TMUs562x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed1674 MHz (3348 data rate)5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth133.9 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2010 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 470 has 39.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 470 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470 is a desktop card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 316 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.