Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs GeForce GTX 460M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460M
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.13
+28.8%

GTX 460M outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking747832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.343.74
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGF106Bristol Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed675 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.112 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460M 3.13
+28.8%
R5 (Bristol Ridge) 2.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 460M 1623
R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1720
+6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 460M 1370
+6.7%
R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1284

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Full HD37
+236%
11
−236%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+15.4%
13
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GTX 460M and R5 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460M is 43% faster in 900p
  • GTX 460M is 236% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 460M is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 460M is ahead in 51 test (91%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 2.43
Recency 3 September 2010 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 12 Watt

GTX 460M has a 28.8% higher aggregate performance score.

R5 (Bristol Ridge), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 460M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 460M
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 24 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.