GeForce FX 5800 vs GTX 460M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking750not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.33no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF106NV30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)6 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed675 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million125 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate21.603.200
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data213 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.19.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 44 Watt

GTX 460M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5800, on the other hand, has 13.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460M and GeForce FX 5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M is a notebook card while GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.