CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M SLI with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460M SLI
2010
2x1536 MB GDDR5
4.97

CMP 30HX outperforms GTX 460M SLI by a whopping 325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking633260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.32
Power efficiencyno data11.58
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN11E-GSTU116
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841408
Core clock speed675 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.1
Floating-point processing powerno data5.027 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52
−323%
220−230
+323%
Full HD65
−315%
270−280
+315%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Hitman 3 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Hitman 3 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Hitman 3 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Hitman 3 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hitman 3 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

This is how GTX 460M SLI and CMP 30HX compete in popular games:

  • CMP 30HX is 323% faster in 900p
  • CMP 30HX is 315% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.97 21.11
Recency 3 September 2010 25 February 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm

CMP 30HX has a 324.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a notebook card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.